The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict Between Animal Research and Animal Protection

University of California Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this sweeping history of animal research and the animal protection movement, Deborah Rudacille examines the ethical question of whether enhancement of human life justifies the use of animals for research. She shows how the question and the answers provided by both scientists and anti-vivisectionists over the past 150 years have shaped contemporary society. Rudacille anchors her narrative in events from the lives of key players in the history of the war between science and animal protection, describing the work of activists who work outside the law as well as those working to change the system from within.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Animal Activism of Henry Spira (1927-1998).Lyle Munro - 2002 - Society and Animals 10 (2):173-191.
The Ethics of Animal Research: What Are the Prospects for Agreement?David Degrazia - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (1):23-34.
Protection of animal research subjects.Czesław Radzikowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):103-110.
Biopolitics: Animals, meat, food.Nikola Janovic - 2009 - Filozofija I Društvo 20 (2):41-58.
Activism for animals.D. Rudacille - 1998 - In Marc Bekoff & Carron A. Meaney (eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Greenwood Press. pp. 1--3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-22

Downloads
2 (#1,808,280)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references