Patologias do social: Um programa de pesquisa

Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 13 (2):117-139 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The aim of this article is to discuss the role of psychoanalysis in a reconstruction of a social critique based in a critique of reason. This requires an operation able to expose social critique as a critique of hegemonical forms of life. Such forms of life are orientated by claims of rationality that are presents in material practices, ways modes of social interaction and institutions



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Resurrecting Language through Social Criticism.Sally J. Scholz - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:203-216.
Hermeneneutics and the social sciences: A Gadamerian critique of Rorty.Georgia Warnke - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):339 – 357.
Pierre bourdieu’s critique of scholarly reason.Roger Foster - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):89-107.
Can Information and Communications Technology Enhance Social Quality?Claire Wallace - 2012 - International Journal of Social Quality 2 (2):98-117.
Can social science be just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Social Life and Social Science: The Significance of the Naturalist/Intentionalist Dispute.Nancy C. M. Hartsock - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:325 - 345.


Added to PP

17 (#873,973)

6 months
3 (#984,149)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vladimir Safatle
University of São Paulo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Book review] the critique of power, reflective stages in a critical social theory. [REVIEW]Honneth Axel - 1994 - In Peter Singer (ed.), Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 104--412.

Add more references