I consider the arguments to show that the vacuum energy density should receive a large contribution from the zero-point energy. This is the cosmological constant problem, as it was originally framed. I suggest that the matter is interpretation-dependent, and that on certain approaches to foundations, notably Everett's, the problem is a formal one, rather than one based on physical principles.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Predictability Crisis in Early Universe Cosmology.Chris Smeenk - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (1):122-133.
Similar books and articles
Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum.Sophie Gibb - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):363-384.
Comments on 'Nonlocal Influences and Possible Worlds'.Henry P. Stapp - 1990 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):59-72.
The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem.Svend E. Rugh & Henrik Zinkernagel - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (4):663-705.
The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem.E. S. & H. Zinkernagel - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (4):663-705.
The Role of Energy Conservation and Vacuum Energy in the Evolution of the Universe.Jan M. Greben - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (2):153-176.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #210,315 of 2,143,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,161 of 2,143,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.