Arguing and observing: Internal and external critiques of judicial impartiality

Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (3):245–265 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00199.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Schedler.Natalie Dandekar - 1992 - Social Theory and Practice 18 (3):333-345.
Modern legal theory and judicial impartiality.Ofer Raban - 2003 - Portland, Or.: GlassHouse Press.
Philosophical critique of natural theology.Charles Taliaferro - 2013 - In J. H. Brooke, F. Watts & R. R. Manning (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford Up. pp. 385.
Nestrannost Nejvyššího soudu: právní hodnoty v politické aréně.Jan Doskočil - unknown
Response to Schedler.Natalie Dandekar - 1992 - Social Theory and Practice 18 (3):333-345.
Formal aspects of Legal reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Feminism and liberalism: a not-so-unhappy marriag.Carla Saen - 2006 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 5 (2):127–146.
Judicial Corrosion: Outlines of a Theory.John Kleinig - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (1):19-30.
Impartiality in Judicial Ethics: A Jurisprudential Analysis.W. Wendel - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 22 (2):305-324.
Racist symbols: Reply to George Schedler.Torin Alter - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#588,332)

6 months
10 (#308,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references