A Counterexample Deity Theory

Philosophia Christi 19 (1):7-21 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his book God and Necessity and in four subsequent papers, Brian Leftow argues against metaphysical theories which hold that “God’s nature makes necessary truths true or gives rise to their truthmakers,” asserting that all such “deity theories commit us to the claim that God’s existence depends on there being truthmakers for particular necessary truths about creatures.” Leftow supports this by arguing that all deity theories entail that if it is untrue that water = H2O, then God does not exist. This paper presents a counterexample deity theory along with a synopsis of its correlative theory of truth and truthmaking.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
18 (#828,658)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The incoherence of divine possibility constructivism.Walter J. Schultz - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (3):347-361.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references