Neutrality and judicial review

Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):217-240 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No Abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Designing judicial review: A comment on Schauer.Emily Sherwin - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):241-246.
Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.Horacio Spector - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (3-4):285-334.
Weak and strong judicial review.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):381-392.
Is judicial review democratic? A comment on Harel.Larry Alexander - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):277-283.
Neutrality without autonomy.Yaacov Ben-Shemesh - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (5):435-466.
Civic liberalism and the 'dialogical model'of judicial review.Colin Farrelly - 2007 - In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue jurisprudence. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 489 - 531.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#410,325)

6 months
11 (#271,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Designing judicial review: A comment on Schauer.Emily Sherwin - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):241-246.
Le Raisonnement Juridique: Une Pratique Spécifique? [REVIEW]Pierre Brunet - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (4):767-782.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Non-neutral principles.Gerald Dworkin - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (14):491-506.

Add more references