On 'the one' in Philolaus, fragment 7

Classical Quarterly 46 (01):114- (1996)
Presocratic philosophy, for all its diverse features, is united by the quest to understand the origin and nature of the world. The approach of the Pythagoreans to this quest is governed by their belief, probably based on studies of the numerical relations in musical harmony, that number or numerical structure plays a key role for explaining the world-order, the cosmos. It remains questionable to what extent the Pythagoreans, by positing number as an all-powerful explanatory concept, broke free from Presocratic ideas that certain stuffs or material elements sufficed to account for the source and constitution of the world, but apparently number found such a universal application with them that Aristotle could summarize the Pythagorean position as ‘numbers…are the whole universe’ . Historians of Greek philosophy have generally accepted Aristotle's assessment. Of late, however, certain scholars have argued that the Pythagorean number doctrine is Aristotelian interpretation, unjustly foisted upon the Pythagoreans. Enlisted in support of their arguments are the fragments of Philolaus of Croton. Here we have the foremost representative of fifth-century Pythagoreanism, who states as his basic principles, not numbers exactly, but ‘limiters’ and ‘unlimiteds’, and who, it is argued, regards number solely as an epistemological aid for understanding the structure of reality. So Philolaus is called upon as a witness against Aristotle. The rationale goes something like this: Aristotle most likely had written sources for his knowledge of Pythagorean teachings; the only texts we know of with any certainty are Philolaus' book and the writings of Archytas; since Aristotle treats Archytas separately, he is mainly relying on Philolaus; because Philolaus does not expressly state that things are numbers, Aristotle's interpretation is wrong
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/cq/46.1.114
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
P. M. Kingsley (1994). Philolaus. The Classical Review 44 (02):294-.
M. E. Hager (1962). Philolaus and the Even-Odd. The Classical Review 12 (01):1-2.
Carl Huffman (2008). Philolaus. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods.
John Bussanich (1995). Philolaus of Croton. Review of Metaphysics 48 (4):897-898.
Wm Romaine Newbold (1906). Philolaus. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 19 (2):176-217.
Mikolaj Szymański (1981). On Authenticity of Philolaus' Fr. B 20. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63 (2):115-117.
Savas Konur (2011). An Event-Based Fragment of First-Order Logic Over Intervals. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (1):49-68.
Jan Patočka (2007). Das Innere und die Welt. Studia Phaenomenologica 7:15-70.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #500,499 of 1,925,795 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,414 of 1,925,795 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.