Two Courts Rule against Admissibility of Testimony

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):5-5 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Courts Rule Against Admissibility of Testimony.Giles R. Scofield - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (1):5-5.
Two Courts Rule Against Admissibility of Testimony.Giles R. Scofield - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (s4):5-5.
Imwinkelried's Argument for Normative Ethical Testimony.David W. Barnes - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):234-241.
Imwinkelried's Argument for Normative Ethical Testimony.David W. Barnes - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):234-241.
Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony.Françoise Baylis - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):240-242.
Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony.Françoise Baylis - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):240-242.
Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics.G. J. Agich & B. J. Spielman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):381-403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
11 (#1,146,652)

6 months
2 (#1,445,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references