Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):52-52 (2004)

Michael Selgelid
Monash University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Response-Dependent Theory of Precedent.Ivo Entchev - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):273-290.
Response to Ethical Dissections of the Case.Anneke Lucassen - 2005 - In Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.), Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 213.
How to Manipulate an Incompatibilistically Free Agent.Roger Clarke - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):139-49.
Counter-Closure.Federico Luzzi - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):673-683.
Stenmark, Plantinga, and Scientific Neutrality.Del Ratzsch - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):353-364.
In That Case: Response.A. Torda - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1).
In That Case: Response.L. Gilbert - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1).
In That Case: Response.H. J. Wilson - 2004 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):180-181.
In That Case: Response.P. Norris - 2004 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):179-180.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,102,612 of 2,448,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,896 of 2,448,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes