David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 10 (2):121-137 (1988)
Advances in analytical understanding of the biosphere’s biogeochemical cycles have spawned concepts of Gaia and noosphere. Earlier in this century, in concert with the Jesuit paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the natural scientist Vladimir Vernadsky developed the notion of noosphere-an evolving collective human consciousness on Earth exerting an ever increasing intluence on biogeochemical processes. More recently, the chemist James Lovelock postulated the Earth to be a self-regulating system made up of biota and their environment with the capacity to maintain a planetary steady state favorable to life. This is the Gaia hypothesis. To many, Gaia and noosphere represent contradictory interpretations of humanity’s relation to planetary ecology. Noosphere emphasizes a free will and obligation to shape the destiny of humanity on Earth through technology and new kinds of social relations. In contrast, Gaia invokes mysterious mechanisms of planetary evolution that lie beyond human control and understanding. I argue that if brought together, noosphere and Gaia can provide a useful symbol for guiding human interventions in global ecology because the contradictions of a nature-centered view of Gaia and a human-centered view of noosphere are coming to be irrelevant with the emergence of an analytical science of the biosphere
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lodovico Galleni (1995). How Does the Teilhardian Vision of Evolution Compare with Contemporary Theories? Zygon 30 (1):25-45.
Similar books and articles
Peter Westbroek (2004). Gaia, Ockham's Razor, the Science of Complexity. World Futures 60 (5 & 6):407 – 420.
Patrick D. Murphy (1988). Sex-Typing the Planet. Environmental Ethics 10 (2):155-168.
Ken Wilber, Dear Marshall Glickman, Thank You for Your Generous Comments About My Work in General and About a Brief History in Particular. Your Central Question Involved This:.
Richard Doyle (2011). Darwin's Pharmacy: Sex, Plants, and the Evolution of the Noosphere. University of Washington Press.
Anthony Weston (1987). Forms of Gaian Ethics. Environmental Ethics 9 (3):217-230.
Thomas J. Donahue (2010). Anthropocentrism and the Argument From Gaia Theory. Ethics and the Environment 15 (2):51-77.
Dirk Baltzly (2009). Gaia Gets to Know Herself : Proclus on the Self-Perception of the Cosmos. Phronesis 54:261-85.
Lawrence E. Joseph (1991). Gaia: The Growth of an Idea. Viking Penguin.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #381,493 of 1,925,107 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,130 of 1,925,107 )
How can I increase my downloads?