Sophia 43 (1):83-99 (2004)
How, from a scientific standpoint, should we understand mystical experiences? On the one hand such experiences are obviously capable of being studied scientifically. Nevertheless there is a sense in which such experiences often seem strongly opposed to our ordinary scientific views of reality, for they often seem to point to a domain quite outside that examined by naturalistic empirical science. Indeed, this is often precisely what seems to be ‘mystical’ about them. The present essay takes a hard look at specific question of the possible significance of these experiences for scientific naturalism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mysticism, Freudianism, and Scientific Psychology.Knight Dunlap - 1920 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
The Philosophy of Scientific Practice in Naturalist Thought: Its Approaches and Problems. [REVIEW]Xiaofei Tian & Tong Wu - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):589-603.
Levin and Ghins on the “No Miracle” Argument and Naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
On Pike on “Union Without Distinction” in Christian Mysticism.Daniel Zelinski - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):493-509.
Scientific Explanations of Mystical Experiences, Part I: The Case of St. Teresa.Evan Fales - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):143-163.
Scientific Naturalism and the Neurology of Religious Experience.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (3):323-345.
The Problem of Pure Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy.R. Forman (ed.) - 1990 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #120,738 of 2,169,384 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,461 of 2,169,384 )
How can I increase my downloads?