Natural Liberation in the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Its Commentaries

Journal of Indian Philosophy 45 (5):863-892 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The subject of this article is the concept of natural liberation in classical Sāṃkhya. On the basis of the Sāṃkhyakārikā by Īśvarakṛṣṇa and its traditional commentaries, I will attempt to demonstrate that liberation from suffering in Sāṃkhya is not the result of rational inquiry—the prevailing view among contemporary scholars. The Sāṃkhya does not necessarily prescribe yogic practice as argued by other scholars. Instead, I will defend a position expressed by K.C. Bhattacharyya and Frank R. Podgorski, according to which liberation in classical Sāṃkhya is a natural and spontaneous process of suffering transforming into its own cure. I will argue that although traditional authorities may disagree over the form the liberating process takes on the phenomenal level, there is a general agreement that the natural forces are the primary drives and agents of liberation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classical Sāṁkhya on the Authorship of the Vedas.Olena Lutsyshyna - 2012 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (4):453-467.
The Liberation of Humanity and Nature.Eric Katz - 2002 - Environmental Values 11 (4):397-405.
Animal Rights and Liberation Movements.David Lamb - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (3):215-233.
Animal Rights and Liberation Movements.David Lamb - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (3):215-233.
The Relationship Between the bhāva.James Kimball - 2016 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 44 (3):537-555.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-21

Downloads
24 (#654,246)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?