- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Jensen's data on Spearman's hypothesis: No artifact
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (3):512-512 (1987)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Jensen's support for Spearman's hypothesis is support for a circular argument.James R. Wilson - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):246-246.
Further evidence for Spearman's hypothesis concerning black–white differences on psychometric tests.Arthur R. Jensen - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (3):512-519.
Jensen's compromise with componentialism.Christopher Brand - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):222-223.
On Spearman's “problem of correlation”.John B. Carroll - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):7-7.
The validity of Jensen's statistical methods.Richard B. Darlington & Carolyn M. Boyce - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):323-324.
Golly g: Interpreting Spearman's general factor.Lyle V. Jones - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):233-233.
The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis.Arthur R. Jensen - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):193-219.
Jensen, Spearman's g, and Ghazali's dates: A commentary on interracial peace.Panos D. Bardis - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):219-220.
Comparative studies of animal intelligence: Is Spearman's g really Hull's D?Euan M. Macphail - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):234-235.
Anomaly versus artifact, or anomalous artifact?Marcello Truzzi - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):614.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)
6 months
38 (#100,987)
2014-01-20
Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)
6 months
38 (#100,987)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction.Douglas Wahlsten - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):109-120.
Trying to shoot the messenger for his message.Robert Plomin - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):144-144.
A nemesis for heritability estimation.Jerry Hirsch - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):137-138.
How does one apply statistical analysis to our understanding of the development of human relationships.Oscar Kempthorne - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):138-139.
Thinking Critically about Race and Genetics.Rose M. Brewer - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):513-519.
References found in this work
The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis.Arthur R. Jensen - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):193-219.
Oh g Dr. Jensen! or, g-ing up cognitive psychology?P. M. A. Rabbitt - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):238-239.
On artificial intelligence.Peter H. Schönemann - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):241-242.
Jensen's compromise with componentialism.Christopher Brand - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):222-223.
The black–white differences are real: Where do we go from here?Keith E. Stanovich - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):242-243.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-6mvtb uwo