Rescher on nomic necessity

Philosophical Studies 28 (3):227 - 228 (1975)
Abstract
(2) All X’s have to be Y’s is to be brought out by glossing the latter as a stronger, nomological generalization involving counterfactural claims, thus: (3) All X’s are Y’s and further if any z that is not an X were an X, then z would be a Y. Professor Rescher points out that while (1) is equivalent to its contrapositive..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00375994
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Galen and the Syllogism.Nicholas Rescher - 1966 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Nomic Necessity and Empiricism.John F. Halpin - 1999 - Noûs 33 (4):630-643.
Essays in Philosophical Analysis.Nicholas Rescher - 1969 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Nomic Necessity and Counterfactual Force.Dennis Temple - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3):221 - 227.
Nomic Necessity is Cross-Theoretic.H.-C. Hung - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):219-236.
Nomic Necessity and Contingency.George N. Schlesinger - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):379-391.
Nomological Necessity and the Paradoxes of Confirmation.Brian Skyrms - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):230-249.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
21 ( #243,210 of 2,192,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,802 of 2,192,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature