Leonie Smith
University of Manchester
Leonie Smith
Cardiff University
In Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics Catherine Lu argues that structural reconciliation, rather than interactional reconciliation, ought to be the primary normative goal for political reconciliation efforts. I suggest that we might have good reason to want to retain relational approaches – such as that of Linda Radzik – as the primary focus of reconciliatory efforts, but that Lu’s approach is invaluable for identifying the parties who ought to bear responsibility for those efforts in cases of structural injustice. First, I outline Lu’s analysis of reconciliation, where she argues for the normative priority of structural approaches within the global political sphere, and propose that it will be useful to identify whether or not a relational account could instead identify underlying structural injustices. Second, I examine one particular relational account of reconciliation (based on Radzik’s account of atonement) and argue that this type of account brings to light underlying structural injustices of the kind Lu is concerned with. Finally, I identify an issue for relational accounts in identifying relevant responsible parties for reconciliation before returning to Lu’s structural account to address this gap.
Keywords Reconciliation  Structural alienation  Relational alienation  Atonement  Catherine Lu  Linda Radzik  Reconciliation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Structural Injustice, Reconciliation and Alienation.Alasia Nuti - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (4):530-537.
Reconciliation.Linda Radzik & Colleen Murphy - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Structuralism and Information.Otávio Bueno - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (3):365-379.
Alienation From Nature and Early German Romanticism.Alison Stone - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):41-54.
Reconciliation: Six Reasons to Worry.Courtney Jung - 2018 - Journal of Global Ethics 14 (2):252-265.
Jus Post Bellum and Political Reconciliation.Colleen Murphy & Linda Radzik - 2013 - In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Political Reconciliation at the Level of Global Governance.Henning Hahn - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):298-311.
Tort Processes and Relational Repair.Linda Radzik - 2014 - In John Oberdiek (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 231-49.
Forgiveness and Reconciliation.Barrett Emerick - 2017 - In Kathryn J. Norlock (ed.), The Moral Psychology of Forgiveness. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 117-134.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #950,376 of 2,505,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes