- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Evolutionary versus instrumental goals: How evolutionary psychology misconceives human rationality
In David E. Over (ed.), Evolution and the Psychology of Thinking: The Debate. Psychology Press. pp. 171--230 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The rationality quotient: toward a test of rational thinking, by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, and Maggie E. Toplak. [REVIEW]Joshua Weller - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):497-502.
Evolutionary psychology's grain problem and the cognitive neuroscience of reasoning.Anthony P. Atkinson & M. Wheeler - 2003 - In David E. Over (ed.), Evolution and the Psychology of Thinking: The Debate. Psychology Press. pp. 61--99.
Rational distinctions and adaptations.D. E. Over & J. St B. T. Evans - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694.
Rationality and the Reflective Mind by Keith E. Stanovich.Cathal Woods - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (3):373-380.
Evolutionary psychology and the rationality of faith.Benjamin Murphy - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (3):466-478.
The rationality of evolutionary psychology.David E. Over - 2002 - In José Luis Bermúdez & Alan Millar (eds.), Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality. New York: Clarendon Press. pp. 187--207.
Biological thinking in evolutionary psychology: Rockbottom or quicksand?Huib de JongLooren & Wim J. van der Steen - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (2):183-205.
Evolutionary psychology and standard social science model.M. Popper - 2003 - Filozofia 58 (1):10-22.
Review of Stanovich, K., West, R. and Toplak, M. ‘The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking’, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press. [REVIEW]Michael Vlerick - 2018 - Quarterly Review of Biology 93:43-44.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-27
Downloads
43 (#110,248)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
2014-01-27
Downloads
43 (#110,248)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory.Keith E. Stanovich - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 55--88.
Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (3):225 – 247.
Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality.Maarten Boudry, Michael Vlerick & Ryan McKay - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:524-535.
Metacognitive Control of Categorial Neurobehavioral Decision Systems.Gordon R. Foxall - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo