Foundations of Physics 37 (9):1370-1385 (2007)
Abstract |
A recent experiment performed by S. Afshar [first reported by M. Chown, New Sci. 183:30, 2004] is analyzed. It was claimed that this experiment could be interpreted as a demonstration of a violation of the principle of complementarity in quantum mechanics. Instead, it is shown here that it can be understood in terms of classical wave optics and the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Its performance is quantified and it is concluded that the experiment is suboptimal in the sense that it does not fully exhaust the limits imposed by quantum mechanics
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10701-007-9153-5 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Quantum Theory and Measurement.John Archibald Wheeler & Wojciech Hubert Zurek - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):480-481.
Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality.Shahriar S. Afshar, Eduardo Flores, Keith F. McDonald & Ernst Knoesel - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (2):295-305.
Citations of this work BETA
Reply to Comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar’s Experiment.Eduardo V. Flores - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (8):778-781.
Critique of Quantum Optical Experimental Refutations of Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity, of the Wootters–Zurek Principle of Complementarity, and of the Particle–Wave Duality Relation.P. N. Kaloyerou - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (2):138-175.
On Visibility in the Afshar Two-Slit Experiment.R. E. Kastner - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (10):1139-1144.
Complementarity Paradox Solved: Surprising Consequences. [REVIEW]E. V. Flores & J. M. De Tata - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (11):1731-1743.
No Paradox in Wave–Particle Duality.Andrew Knight - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (11):1723-1727.
Similar books and articles
Complementarity Paradox Solved: Surprising Consequences. [REVIEW]E. V. Flores & J. M. De Tata - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (11):1731-1743.
On Visibility in the Afshar Two-Slit Experiment.R. E. Kastner - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (10):1139-1144.
Why the Afshar Experiment Does Not Refute Complementarity.Ruth Kastner - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (4):649-658.
Reply to Comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar’s Experiment.Eduardo V. Flores - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (8):778-781.
Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality.Shahriar S. Afshar, Eduardo Flores, Keith F. McDonald & Ernst Knoesel - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (2):295-305.
Refinements of the Interpretation of Complementarity From Afshar's Experiment.Osvaldo Pessoa Júnior - 2013 - Scientiae Studia 11 (1):119-139.
The Effect of Localization on Interference. II. Bearing on Locality Violation and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Charles E. Engelke - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (9):917-921.
Correct Exposition of Complementarity in Unruh's and Afshar's Experiments.Danko Georgiev - manuscript
On the Nonoccurrence of Two Paradoxes in the Measurement Scheme of Stochastic Quantum Mechanics.F. E. Schroeck - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (3):279-302.
The Quantum Potential and Signalling in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment.P. R. Holland & J. P. Vigier - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (7):741-750.
Is Quantum Suicide Painless? On an Apparent Violation of the Principal Principle.Milan M. Ćirković - 2004 - Foundations of Science 11 (3):287-296.
On the Physical Reality of Quantum Waves.Gennaro Auletta & Gino Tarozzi - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1675-1694.
On the Wootters-Zurek Development of Einstein's Two-Slit Experiment.P. N. Kaloyerou - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (11):1345-1377.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-22
Total views
38 ( #270,714 of 2,419,597 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,199 of 2,419,597 )
2013-11-22
Total views
38 ( #270,714 of 2,419,597 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,199 of 2,419,597 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads