Literature and the revolution.: Guest editor introduction

Studies in East European Thought 71 (1):5-9 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses Leo Tolstoy’s view of the Russian revolutionary movement. Taking as a focal point the writer’s lifelong interest in the Decembrist uprising of 1825 and particularly in the personalities of the gentry revolutionaries, the article argues that Tolstoy’s fascination for these figures was due to their superior moral qualities, rather than to their political and socioeconomic doctrines. Following Alexander Herzen, Tolstoy came to regard the Decembrists as full-fledged individualities and “beautiful souls”. Thus, Tolstoy’s much debated “conversion” and subsequent attempts to transform literary art into a medium of religious and moral reform can also be viewed as extensions of his project of self-understanding and self-formation according to the model of kalokagathia provided by Russia’s aristocratic revolutionaries.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza and Tolstoy in Valentin Asmus’ comparative analysis.Svetlana Klimova - 2021 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (3):345-357.
Die Vorahnung der Revolution in den Werken russischer Schriftsteller.Dagmar Mironowa - 2019 - Studies in East European Thought 71 (1):63-72.
Tolstoy's Art and Thought, 1847-1880.Donna Tussing Orwin - 1993 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
L.N. Tolstoy: Enstrangement, Politics, Religion.Svetlana M. Klimova - 2021 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 59 (5):362-380.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-26

Downloads
15 (#945,692)

6 months
2 (#1,445,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Russian Thinkers.Julia Annas, Isaiah Berlin, Henry Hardy & Aileen Kelly - 1980 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (121):357.

Add more references