Corporate Responsibility in Scandinavian Supply Chains
Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):179 - 185 (2009)
Abstract
This article examines corporate responsibility in the supply chains of four of the largest Scandinavian multinational corporations - IKEA, Nokia, Novo Nordisk, and StatoilHydro - and offers two key findings. First, these Scandinavian companies have all implemented responsible supply chain practices where suppliers in developing nations, and the communities of these suppliers, are engaged as key stakeholders and treated as partners. Second, these supply chain practices all share the common bond of having honesty and the establishment of trust-based relationships at their foundation. As a result, these Scandinavian companies have developed a "cooperative advantage" in their ability to form successful, long-term partnerships in their respective supply chainsDOI
10.1007/s10551-008-9937-3
My notes
Similar books and articles
Corporate social responsibility in the european communities — the scandinavian viewpoint.Morten P. Broberg - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (6):615 - 622.
The Ethics of Global Supply Chains in China: Convergences of East and West.David A. Krueger - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1-2):113 - 120.
Stakeholders' perceptions and future scenarios to improve corporate social responsibility in Hong Kong and mainland china.Joyce Tsoi - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (3):391 - 404.
Detecting Supply Chain Innovation Potential for Sustainable Development.Raine Isaksson, Peter Johansson & Klaus Fischer - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):425 - 442.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Purchasing and Supply Chain.Mohammad Salam - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):355 - 370.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
61 (#196,956)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2009-01-28
Downloads
61 (#196,956)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Management of Social Issues in Supply Chains: A Literature Review Exploring Social Issues, Actions and Performance Outcomes.Sadaat Ali Yawar & Stefan Seuring - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 141 (3):621-643.
Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia. [REVIEW]Robert Strand & R. Edward Freeman - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (1):1-21.
Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance.Paul McGrath, Marius Claudy, Lucy McCarthy & Donna Marshall - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 154 (4):1081-1102.
Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models.Clodia Vurro, Angeloantonio Russo & Francesco Perrini - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):607 - 621.
The Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of Its Presence in Top Management Teams. [REVIEW]Robert Strand - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (4):721-734.
References found in this work
Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.T. Jones, A. Wicks & R. Edward Freeman - 2002 - In Norman E. Bowie (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 19--37.