Commentary

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):98-100 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whether surrogate decisionmakers have the authority to refuse pain and symptom management measures on behalf of incapacitated patients is a particularly timely question to ask in this era of growing commitment to ensuring appropriate pain and symptom management measures for all patients

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary.Paul B. Hofmann - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):96-97.
Commentary.Robert V. Brody - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):100-100.
Commentary: The Reluctant Surrogate.Thomas Foreman - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (2):330-333.
Commentary: Surrogate Decisionmaking and Communication.Debjani Mukherjee - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (3):560-563.
Commentary.Courtney S. Campbell - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (4):452-454.
Commentary.Ben A. Rich - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):100-104.
Commentary.David Lowenthal - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):423-425.
Commentary.Kenneth W. Goodman - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):133-135.
Commentary.Andrew Thurman - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):129-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
46 (#355,543)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references