Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Contemporary Neo-Berlinians contend that value pluralism is the best account of the moral universe we inhabit; they also contend that value pluralism provides a powerful case for liberalism. In this paper, I challenge both claims. Specifically, I will examine the arguments offered in support of value pluralism; finding them lacking, I will then offer some reasons for thinking that value pluralism is not an especially promising view of our moral universe
|
Keywords | Pluralism Liberalism Values Regret Berlin, Isaiah Galston, William Crowder, George |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10677-010-9229-8 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability.Stephen Darwall - 1996 - Harvard University Press.
View all 37 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum.Craig L. Carr - 2010 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Does Value Pluralism Entail Liberalism?Robert Talisse - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):303-320.
Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company.John Gray - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation.Thomas Fossen - 2008 - Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-05-22
Total views
143 ( #83,060 of 2,520,772 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,509 of 2,520,772 )
2010-05-22
Total views
143 ( #83,060 of 2,520,772 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,509 of 2,520,772 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads