Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100 (2011)

Authors
Robert B. Talisse
Vanderbilt University
Abstract
Contemporary Neo-Berlinians contend that value pluralism is the best account of the moral universe we inhabit; they also contend that value pluralism provides a powerful case for liberalism. In this paper, I challenge both claims. Specifically, I will examine the arguments offered in support of value pluralism; finding them lacking, I will then offer some reasons for thinking that value pluralism is not an especially promising view of our moral universe
Keywords Pluralism  Liberalism  Values  Regret  Berlin, Isaiah  Galston, William  Crowder, George
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-010-9229-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,425
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-05-22

Total views
140 ( #70,636 of 2,420,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #103,253 of 2,420,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes