Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100 (2011)
Contemporary Neo-Berlinians contend that value pluralism is the best account of the moral universe we inhabit; they also contend that value pluralism provides a powerful case for liberalism. In this paper, I challenge both claims. Specifically, I will examine the arguments offered in support of value pluralism; finding them lacking, I will then offer some reasons for thinking that value pluralism is not an especially promising view of our moral universe
|Keywords||Pluralism Liberalism Values Regret Berlin, Isaiah Galston, William Crowder, George|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability.Stephen L. Darwall - 2006 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William A. Galston, Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice:Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice.Carmen Pavel - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):615-618.
Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation.Thomas Fossen - 2008 - Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394.
Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company.John Gray - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Does Value Pluralism Entail Liberalism?Robert B. Talisse - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):303-320.
Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise.Richard Bellamy - 1999 - Routledge.
Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum.Craig L. Carr - 2010 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity.Maria Baghramian & Attracta Ingram (eds.) - 2000 - Routledge.
Added to index2010-05-22
Total downloads77 ( #68,390 of 2,171,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,603 of 2,171,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?