Western Livestock Production and Their Challenge to Thompson’s Food System Archetypes

In Samantha Noll & Zachary Piso (eds.), Paul B. Thompson's Philosophy of Agriculture: Fields, Farmers, Forks, and Food. Springer Verlag. pp. 87-102 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Food systems are complex and made especially so by the competing values that diverse communities attribute to them and expect from them. The four archetypes of food systems that Paul B. Thompson has conceptualized help to provide clarity to this complexity; however, the food system of livestock production in the American West does not neatly align with any of these. In this chapter, I briefly describe the archetypes and how they each align and misalign with my experiences in this food system. My readers can expect to learn a bit about the history of grazing in the West, federally managed lands, current livestock practices in the West, and how the intertwining of the three create a food system that challenges the four archetypes. Ultimately, I aim to illustrate that Western livestock production systems do not fit neatly into Thompson’s archetypes, leading to either refining the archetypes or the emergence of a fifth archetype that shares features with (but is not reducible to) the others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paternalism, Health and Dietary Choices.Jeffrey M. Brown - 2017 - Social Philosophy Today 33:217-224.
From Field to Fork: Food Ethics for Everyone.Paul B. Thompson - 2015 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-03

Downloads
3 (#1,727,655)

6 months
3 (#1,046,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references