The challenge of empirically assessing the effects of constitutions

Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (1):46-76 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mutually supporting methodologies are necessary for building a convincing case establishing a particular effect. Strengths and weaknesses of four empirical methods are discussed. Econometric methods quantify the relative importance of different factors and may assess the time frame over which constitutions matter, but have difficulties in dealing with nonlinear interactions among constitutional and cultural details. Cluster analysis can be a pre-requisite to other methods, and an analytic method in itself, useful for identifying the details that really matter and discovering surprising patterns in the data. I discuss the application of cluster analysis on the Comparative Constitutions Project database. Qualitative comparative analysis can reveal the hidden structure of interactions among different variables, but robustness checks are difficult to perform. Case studies are useful for distinguishing between rules-in-use and rules-in-form and for discovering important informal aspects. They can deal with com..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-06

Downloads
11 (#971,848)

6 months
2 (#658,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Understanding Institutional Diversity.Elinor Ostrom - 2007 - Environmental Values 16 (1):129-132.

Add more references