The United States and the UN's Targeted Sanctions of Suspected Terrorists: What Role for Human Rights?

Ethics and International Affairs 24 (2):131-142 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The UN Security Council's approach to counterterrorism, which the United States has greatly shaped, has generally shown a marked human rights deficit. The process for seizing the assets of and imposing travel bans on suspected terrorists and their financiers must be reformed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Predator and prey: Seizing and killing suspected terrorists abroad.Steven R. Ratner - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3):251–275.
Introduction.Joy Gordon - 2019 - Ethics and International Affairs 33 (3):275-277.
The Human Rights Council: A New Era in UN Human Rights Work?Yvonne Terlingen - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (2):167-178.
Continuing the conversation on chinese human rights.Roger T. Ames - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:177–205.
Human Rights in the Seventy-Fifth Year of the UN.Bertrand Ramcharan - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 34 (3):329-338.
The UN's Roles in International Relations.Adam Roberts & Benedict Kingsbury - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:8-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-02

Downloads
7 (#1,405,108)

6 months
4 (#1,005,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references