The Nature of Substance

Cogito 2 (2):17-19 (1988)
Authors
Ian J. Thompson
Livermore Laboratory
Abstract
Modern physics has cast doubt on Newton's idea of particles with definite properties. Do we have to go back to Aristotle for a new understanding of the ultimate nature of substance? If we ask, `what is the nature of substance?', we might be told that this substance is salt, that one is copper, or that the atomic nucleus is a mixture of protons and neutrons. But what are all these substances? What do they have in common which makes them substances? We don't seem to think that such things as colours, numbers, or shapes are by themselves `substantial enough' to be substances in their own right. We therefore change our question to `what is it to be a substance?', or to `what is the ultimate nature of the simplest substances?'.
Keywords General Interest  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0950-8864
DOI 10.5840/cogito1988227
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-13

Total downloads
149 ( #40,096 of 2,287,742 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #51,166 of 2,287,742 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature