16 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Michail Peramatzis [13]Michail M. Peramatzis [3]
  1.  60
    Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.Michail Peramatzis - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    Michail Peramatzis presents a new interpretation of Aristotle's view of the priority relations between fundamental and derivative parts of reality, following ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  2.  67
    Aristotle’s Hylomorphism: The Causal-Explanatory Model.Michail Peramatzis - 2018 - Metaphysics 1 (1):12-32.
    There are several innocuous or trivial ways in which to explicate Aristotle’s hylomorphism. For example: objects are characterisable in terms of matter and form; or analysable into matter and form; or understood on the basis of matter and form. Serious problems arise when we seek to specify the sorts of relation holding among the different contributors to the hylomorphic picture. Here are some central general questions: a. What types of relation are most suitable for each n-tuple of contributors? b. What (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3. Aristotle on Truth-Bearers.David Charles & Michail Peramatzis - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50:101-141.
  4. Aristotle's Notion of Priority in Nature and Substance.Michail Peramatzis - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35:187-247.
  5.  12
    Posterior analytics II.11, 94b8-26: Final cause and demonstration.Michail Peramatzis - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):323-351.
    I present the text at Posterior Analytics II.11, 94b8-26, offer a tentative translation, discuss the main construals offered in the literature, and argue for my own interpretation. Some of the general questions I discuss are the following: 1. What is the nature of the explanatory syllogisms offered as examples, especially in the case of the moving and the final cause? Are they scientific demonstrative explanations? In the case of the final cause, are they practical syllogisms? Are they productive? 2. Are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  68
    Essence and per se predication in Aristotle's metaphysics Z 4.Michail M. Peramatzis - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39.
  7. Aristotle's Notion of Priority in Nature and Substance.Michail M. Peramatzis - 2008 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Xxxv: Winter 2008. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  8.  47
    Sameness, Definition, and Essence.Michail Peramatzis - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 7 (2):142.
    I formulate an apparent inconsistency between some claims Aristotle makes in his Metaphysics about the sameness and non-sameness relations which obtain between an object and its essence: while a object is not the same as its essence, an essence is thought as being the same as its essence. I discuss different ways in which one may propose to overcome this apparent inconsistency and show that they are problematic. My diagnosis of the problem is that all these putative solutions share the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  47
    Form, Matter, Substance, by Kathrin Koslicki.Michail Peramatzis - 2020 - Mind 129 (513):235-245.
    _ Form, Matter, Substance _, by KoslickiKathrin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. xiii + 273.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Essence and per se Predication in Aristotle's Metaphysics?Michail M. Peramatzis - 2010 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Volume 39. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  16
    Conceptions of Truth in Plato’s Sophist.Michail Peramatzis - 2020 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (3):333-378.
    The paper seeks to specify how, according to Plato’s Sophist, true statements achieve their being about objects and their saying that ‘what is about such objects is’. Drawing on the 6th definition of the sophist, I argue for a normative-teleological conception of truth in which the best condition of our soul –in its making statements or having mental states– consists in its seeking to attain the telos of truth. Further, on the basis of Plato’s discussion of original and image, his (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  41
    Aristotle, posterior analytics. F.A.J. De Haas, M. leunissen, M. Martijn interpreting Aristotle's posterior analytics in late antiquity and beyond. Pp. XXIV + 269. Leiden and boston: Brill, 2010. Cased, €111, us$144. Isbn: 978-90-04-20127-9. [REVIEW]Michail Peramatzis - 2015 - The Classical Review 65 (2):380-382.
  13. Algumas observações sobre a noção aristotélica de prioridade em natureza e em subst'ncia.Michail Peramatzis - 2010 - Dois Pontos 7 (3).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  24
    Metaphysics A.7, 988b16-21.Michail Peramatzis - 2017 - Philosophical Inquiry 41 (2-3):55-65.
    The last six lines of Aristotle's Metaphysics A.7 draw some important conclusions about Aristotle's predecessors' grasp of the four types of cause. Aristotle argues that his account of his predecessors supports his conception of the four causes and his claim that in first philosophy, too, we should seek to understand our subject-matter on the basis of these four causes. I offer a detailed textual and philosophical interpretation of these lines, connect them with Aristotle's argument in Metaphysics A.1-6, and examine their (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  33
    Algumas observações sobre a noção aristotélica de prioridade em natureza e em substância.Michail Peramatzis - 2010 - Doispontos 7 (3).
    Aristotle’s notion of priority in nature and in substance, as introduced in Metaphysics 1019a2-4, has been traditionally understood in terms of priority in existence: x is prior to y if x can exist without y’s existing, but y cannot exist without x’s existing. In this paper I challenge this traditional view. I argue for an alternative view in terms of priority in being, which is ontological counterpart of definitional priority. According to priority in being, x is prior to y if (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  19
    Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I, by Jonathan Barnes.Michail Peramatzis - 2014 - Mind 123 (489):183-189.