Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999) [Book Review]

Argumentation 15 (2):223-229 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1011157310039

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). [REVIEW]William Twining - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):223-229.
Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314.
Argumentation from Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - unknown - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):20-30.
The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation in Complex Structures of Legal Justification.Eveline Feteris - unknown
Formal aspects of Legal reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in a Legal Context: The Role of Pragmatic Argumentation in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline T. Feteris - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):61-79.
Comments on 'Strategic Manoeuvring with the Intention of the Legislator in the Justification of Judicial Decisions'.Peter J. Schulz - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):355-357.
Retraction Note to: Comments on ‘Strategic Manoeuvring with the Intention of the Legislator in the Justification of Judicial Decisions’.Peter J. Schulz - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):493-493.
Retracted article: Comments on ‘strategic manoeuvring with the intention of the legislator in the justification of judicial decisions’.Peter J. Schulz - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):355-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
40 (#410,325)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning.David A. Schum - 1994 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Interscience.
How to Do Things with Rules.William Twining & David Miers - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references