Who's/whose at risk? answerability and the critical possibilities of classroom discourse

Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2):201-223 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our aim in this article is twofold. First, we challenge the essentialized notion of adolescents and young people as perpetually driven to resist the authority of adults. At the same time, we disrupt linguistic conceptions of adolescent discourse, along with the discourse of youth at risk, by analyzing a transcript of classroom discourse that reflects an exchange between a highly regarded and well liked preservice teacher and his students. This representative transcript highlights the preservice teacher's ability to query, without a concomitant ability to listen, respond, and build a classroom dialogue with his students; what we call here a Socratic monologue. Second, we link the notions of dialogue and responsiveness to Bakhtin's concept of answerability, emphasizing the joint construction of classroom discourse as an ethically answerable relation between teacher and students. He is currently doing research on new Asian pedagogies. Her research interests include applying sociocultural and critical lenses to the study of identity construction, in particular, the social construction of “at risk” identities for young people. Her current research documents the experiences of students and teachers in alternative high school programs. She is co-editor of Re/constructing “the adolescent”: Sign, symbol and body forthcoming from Peter Lang, Educational imaginings: On the play of texts and contexts with Shaun Rawolle published by Australian Academic Press, and Crossing boundaries: Perspectives across paradigms in educational research, with Paula Jervis-Tracey, also published by Australian Academic Press.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychologism.Charles Travis - 2006 - In Barry C. Smith (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 103--26.
Normativity and the material effects of discourse.Allan Luke - 2005 - Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2):198-201.
Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Controversy and Critical Thinking Involving African-American Families.Susan H. Peet - 2004 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (1-2):13-19.
Critical Thinking in the Literature Classroom, Part I: Making Critical Thinking Visible.Amanda Hiner - 2013 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 28 (1):26-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-01

Downloads
11 (#1,136,567)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pedagogy of the oppressed.Paulo Freire - 1986 - In David J. Flinders & Stephen J. Thornton (eds.), The Curriculum Studies Reader. Routledge.
Thought and Language.A. L. Wilkes, L. S. Vygotsky, E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (55):178.
Marxism and the philosophy of language.V. N. Voloshinov - 1973 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by Ladislav Matejka & I. R. Titunik.
Thought and Language.Lev Vygotsky - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (2):190-191.

View all 13 references / Add more references