Assessing Law's Claim to Authority

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (3):481-501 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that law claims authority (LCA) has recently been forcefully criticized by a number of authors. These authors present a new and intriguing objection, arguing that law cannot be said to claim authority if such a claim is not justified. That is, these authors argue that the view that law does not have authority viciously conflicts with the view that law claims authority. I will call this the normative critique of LCA. In this article, I assess the normative critique of LCA, focusing predominantly on the arguments presented by its most incisive proponent Philip Soper. I defend a twofold conclusion. First, LCA, understood roughly along the lines put forward by Joseph Raz, is part of the most attractive analysis of law. Second, proponents of the normative critique, and in particular Soper, are committed to accepting LCA.

Similar books and articles

The Inevitability of Moral Evaluation.Peter Rijpkema - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (4):413-434.
Legitimacy is Not Authority.Jon Garthoff - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
Authority and authorisation.B. Roermund - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (2):201-222.
The Moral Authority of International Law.Anthony Reeves - 2010 - APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law 10 (1):13-18.
Authority and authorisation.Bert van Roermund - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (2):201-222.
The authority of law: essays on law and morality.Joseph Raz - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Kelsen's concept of the authority of law.Bruno Celano - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (2):173-199.
Form and Agency in Raz’s Legal Positivism.Kristen Rundle - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (6):767-791.
Normative authority for empirical science.Wim de Muijnck - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):263-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-07

Downloads
1,851 (#4,398)

6 months
80 (#47,752)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bas Van Der Vossen
Chapman University

Citations of this work

Was Ellen Wronged?Stephen P. Garvey - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):185-216.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justification and legitimacy.A. John Simmons - 1999 - Ethics 109 (4):739-771.
The definition of lying.Thomas L. Carson - 2006 - Noûs 40 (2):284–306.

Add more references