Philosophia 37 (1):91-104 (2009)

Authors
Liezl Van Zyl
University of Waikato
Abstract
In this paper I argue that the disagreement between modern moral philosophers and (some) virtue ethicists about whether motive affects rightness is a result of conceptual disagreement, and that when they develop a theory of ‘right action,’ the two parties respond to two very different questions. Whereas virtue ethicists tend to use ‘right’ as interchangeable with ‘good’ or ‘virtuous’ and as implying moral praise, modern moral philosophers use it as roughly equivalent to ‘in accordance with moral obligation.’ One implication of this is that the possibility of an act being right by accident does not pose a problem for consequentialism or deontology. A further implication is that it reveals a shortcoming in virtue ethics, namely that it does not—yet needs to—present an account of moral obligation.
Keywords Accidental rightness  Good (praiseworthy or virtuous) action  Justice  Right action  Moral obligation  Virtue ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2008, 2009
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-008-9136-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism.J. S. Mill - 1861 - Oxford University Press UK.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Right Action as Virtuous Action.Nicholas Ryan Smith - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):241-254.
A New Form of Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Daniel Doviak - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):259-272.
Political Anti-Intentionalism.Matthias Brinkmann - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (2):159-179.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contextualism for Consequentialists.Alastair Norcross - 2005 - Acta Analytica 20 (2):80-90.
Right Act, Virtuous Motive.Thomas Hurka - 2010 - In Heather D. Battaly (ed.), Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 58-72.
Rightness and Goodness in Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Liezl Van Zyl - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:103-114.
Subjective Rightness.Holly M. Smith - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):64-110.
In Defense of the Primacy of the Virtues.Jason Kawall - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (2):1-21.
Good and Bad Actions.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
69 ( #168,120 of 2,519,593 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,593 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes