Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (4):725 - 762 (2006)

Authors
Abstract
Given the fact that both R.G. Collingwood and P.F. Strawson introduced, inspired by Kant, a 'reform of metaphysics' and thereby used a strikingly similar terminology, the absence of an extensive article about the comparison between their concepts of a 'reformed metaphysics' is, to say the least, rather surprising. The first aim of this article is filling up this gap. But there is more at stake. Traditionally, a twofold connection is laid between their concepts of metaphysics. First, there is the fact that both authors consider metaphysics as a reflexion about the basic presuppositions of our thought and so subscribe to Kant's 'reform of metaphysics'. Subsequently, the central point of difference to be considered is that Strawson sets basic presuppositions as universal and invariable and so more directly leans against Kant than Collingwood who ascribes to these presuppositions a variable and cultural-historical character. In this article — and that is its central aim — I would like to make some critical remarks to this interpretation. First, I try to show how the resemblances between their concepts of metaphysics originate from their adoption of both Kants 'Copernican revolution' and his repudiation of transcendent metaphysics. Furthermore, I want to point out the differences between both their concepts of metaphysics, starting from their respective interpretations of Kant s transcendental idealism. While Strawson propounds an 'anodyne' interpretation of transcendental idealism, Collingwood proposes a 'radicalization' of transcendental idealism. Against the backdrop of these different interpretations, the contrast between the universal character of Strawson's metaphysics and the so-called historical-relativist character of Collingwood s metaphysics can be clarified. Finally, I will dwell on six repercussions of both their views of metaphysics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Strawson and Schaumann on the Metaphysics of Transcendental Idealism.Scott Stapleford - 2008 - South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):273-279.
Collingwood and the Sea Anemone.Tim Lord - 2011 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):117-134.
Is R.g. Collingwood wel een metafysicus?G. Vanheeswijck - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (2):341 - 353.
Metaphysics, History and the Unpublished Manuscripts.John Luckman - 1991 - International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):27-45.
An Essay on Metaphysics.R. G. Collingwood - 1940 - Oxford University Press.
Collingwood's Doctrine of Absolute Presuppositions.John E. Llewelyn - 1961 - Philosophical Quarterly 11 (42):49-60.
Sartre, Strawson and Others.Mark Sacks - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):275-299.
Strawson's Transcendental Deduction.Eddy M. Zemach - 1975 - Philosophical Quarterly 25 (April):114-125.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
30 ( #328,387 of 2,343,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,299 of 2,343,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes