Metaphysical Amphibians: Aquinas on the Individuation and Identity of Human Beings

Dissertation, Cornell University (2000)

Abstract
According to Thomas Aquinas, human beings are metaphysical amphibians: they live both in the corporeal world of rocks and trees and in the immaterial world of the intellect. This unusual status is due to the rational soul, which is the substantial from of the human body and able to transcend that body through abstract thought. Aquinas holds that the human soul is not a substance, and that a human being is not identical to her soul. Taken together, these claims commit Aquinas to the denial of a strong from of substance dualism. ;These claims raise difficulties for Aquinas's accounts of individuation and identity, however, when taken in conjunction with his belief that, at death, the soul persists in separation from matter until the bodily resurrection. If matter is necessary for individuation, how can human souls remain individuated in separation from material bodies? Further, if the human being is not identical to the human soul, the existence of the disembodied soul constitutes a gap in the continuity of the human being. How, then, can the resurrected human being be numerically identical to the original human being? ;In the dissertation, I examine and evaluate Aquinas's claims about the individuation and identity of human beings, and I argue that his account of human nature is more promising than philosophers from Suarez to Swinburne have traditionally agreed. ;My defense of Aquinas has three main stages: first, I address Aquinas's general theory of individuation ; I argue that this theory is both coherent and philosophically plausible. Second, I address the individuation of disembodied human souls---I claim that souls remain individuated in separation from matter by a continuing relation to their bodies. Third, I argue that although Aquinas's theory of human identity is problematic, the contemporary notion of immanent causation allows us to understand the separated soul as guaranteeing that the appropriate causal relations hold between the original and the resurrected human being
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on the Soul: Substantial Form and Subsistent Entity.Linda P. Jenks - 1985 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Aquinas and the Individuation of Human Persons Revisited.Montague Brown - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):167-185.
Aquinas on Human Life After Death.Silas Nacer Langley - 2002 - Dissertation, Fordham University
Aquinas and Siger in the Thirteenth Century-Monopsychism Controversy.Jaekyung Lee - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Psychology and Mind in Aquinas.Miguel Garcia-Valdecasas - 2005 - History of Psychiatry 16 (3):291-310.
Matter and the Human Body According to Thomas Aquinas.Linda L. Farmer - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Ottawa (Canada)
Aquinas's Theory of Human Self-Knowledge.Carl Nelson Still - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Potentially Human? Aquinas on Aristotle on Human Generation.José Filipe Silva - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):3-21.
The End of (Human) Life as We Know It.Christina Van Dyke - 2012 - Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):243-257.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes