The controversy between John H. Northrop and Max Delbrück on the formation of bacteriophage: Bacterial synthesis or autonomous multiplication?

Annals of Science 49 (6):545-575 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryIn the 1940s a controversy developed between John H. Northrop (Nobel Laureate, 1946) and Max Delbrück (Nobel Laureate, 1969) on the formation of bacteriophage. From the historiography of molecular biology there emerges a picture of an obstinate Northrop who repudiated the ‘correct’ insights revealed by the experiments of Delbrück. The established reputation of Northrop confronts one with the question of why Delbrück's epoch-making experiments were not convincing for Northrop. It will be argued that this was a consequence of local incommensurability between Northrop's physiological/chemical research style and Delbrück's bacteriological/genetic research style. The analysis of this controversy reveals the elements that made up these two research styles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

McAllister on Northrop.Fred Seddon - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:261-269.
McAllister on Northrop.Fred Seddon - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:261-269.
Max Delbruck and the Birth of Molecular Biology.William Hayes - 1984 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 51.
Northrop on Russian communism.Fred A. Seddon - 1986 - Studies in East European Thought 32 (2):133-154.
Northrop on Russian Communism.Fred A. Seddon - 1986 - Studies in Soviet Thought 32 (2):133-154.
Northrop Frye on Religion.NorthropHG Frye - 2000 - University of Toronto Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
48 (#323,421)

6 months
9 (#436,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bringing physics to bear on the phenomenon of life: the divergent positions of Bohr, Delbrück, and Schrödinger.Andrew T. Domondon - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):433-458.
When viruses were not in style: Parallels in the histories of chicken sarcoma viruses and bacteriophages.Neeraja Sankaran - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48:189-199.
The study of lysogeny at the Pasteur Institute (1950–1960): an epistemologically open system.Nadine Peyrieras & Michel Morange - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):419-430.
Bringing physics to bear on the phenomenon of life: the divergent positions of Bohr, Delbrück, and Schrödinger.Andrew T. Domondon - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):433-458.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Kuhn's conception of incommensurability.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (3):481-492.
Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology.J. Cairns, G. S. Stent & J. D. Watson - 1968 - Journal of the History of Biology 1 (1):155-161.

View all 9 references / Add more references