Review: Replies to Discussion on "The Possibility of Practical Reason" [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 121 (3):277 - 298 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Discussion: Velleman on Action and Agency. [REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):249 - 261.
Discussion – Velleman on Action and Agency. [REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):249-261.
Discussion – Velleman on action and agency. [REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):249 - 261.
Précis of The Possibility of Practical Reason.J. David Velleman - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):225 - 238.
Replies to discussion on the empirical.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171-192.
Replies. [REVIEW]Fred Feldman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (3):439 - 450.
Replies.Laurence Bonjour - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):743-759.
Replies to Critics.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):313-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
35 (#445,023)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. David Velleman
New York University

Citations of this work

The Shmagency Question.Matthew Silverstein - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1127-1142.
Agency, Shmagency.David Enoch - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (2):169-198.
Normative reasons as good bases.Alex Gregory - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2291-2310.
Teleology and Normativity.Matthew Silverstein - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 11:214-240.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references