Replies to discussion on the empirical

Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171-192 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to discussion on the Empirical Stance.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171-192.
Discussion – epistemic options. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):147 - 158.
BAS C. VAN FRAASSEN: The Empirical Stance. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Koperski - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):256-259.
Bas C. van Fraassen, The Empirical Stance. [REVIEW]Leon Horsten - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):95-97.
Whither constructive empiricism?Paul Teller - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 106 (1-2):123 - 150.
Replies. [REVIEW]Fred Feldman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (3):439 - 450.
Bas Van Fraassen, The Empirical Stance. [REVIEW]Bruce Hunter - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (6):419-422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
19 (#825,863)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bas C. Van Fraassen
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):117-124.
The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):200-223.
Constraints on Rational Theory Choice.Seamus Bradley - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (3):639-661.
I—The Virtues of Relativism.Maria Baghramian - 2019 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93 (1):247-269.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations