Minds and Machines 31 (1):137-163 (2021)
Abstract |
Accountability and responsibility are key concepts in the academic and societal debate on Autonomous Weapon Systems, but these notions are often used as high-level overarching constructs and are not operationalised to be useful in practice. “Meaningful Human Control” is often mentioned as a requirement for the deployment of Autonomous Weapon Systems, but a common definition of what this notion means in practice, and a clear understanding of its relation with responsibility and accountability is also lacking. In this paper, we present a definition of these concepts and describe the relations between accountability, responsibility, control and oversight in order to show how these notions are distinct but also connected. We focus on accountability as a particular form of responsibility—the obligation to explain one’s action to a forum—and we present three ways in which the introduction of Autonomous Weapon Systems may create “accountability gaps”. We propose a Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight based on an engineering, socio-technical and governance perspective on control. Our main claim is that combining the control mechanisms at technical, socio-technical and governance levels will lead to comprehensive human oversight over Autonomous Weapon Systems which may ensure solid controllability and accountability for the behaviour of Autonomous Weapon Systems. Finally, we give an overview of the military control instruments that are currently used in the Netherlands and show the applicability of the comprehensive human oversight Framework to Autonomous Weapon Systems. Our analysis reveals two main gaps in the current control mechanisms as applied to Autonomous Weapon Systems. We have identified three first options as future work for the design of a control mechanism, one in the technological layer, one in the socio-technical layer and one the governance layer, in order to achieve comprehensive human oversight and ensure accountability over Autonomous Weapon Systems.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11023-020-09532-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata. [REVIEW]Andreas Matthias - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (3):175-183.
Robots and Respect: Assessing the Case Against Autonomous Weapon Systems.Robert Sparrow - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (1):93-116.
Meaningful Human Control as Reason-Responsiveness: The Case of Dual-Mode Vehicles.Giulio Mecacci & Filippo Santoni de Sio - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (2):103-115.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Arguments for Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Critique.Hunter Cantrell - 2019 - Dissertation, Georgia State University
Coupling Levels of Abstraction in Understanding Meaningful Human Control of Autonomous Weapons: A Two-Tiered Approach.Steven Umbrello - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):455-464.
Autonomous Weapon Systems - An Alleged Responsibility Gap.Torben Swoboda - 2017 - In Vincent C. Müller (ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2017. Springer.
Trust and Resilient Autonomous Driving Systems.Adam Henschke - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (1):81-92.
Feasible Precautions in Attack and Autonomous Weapons.Jeffrey S. Thurnher - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 99-117.
Unmanned Maritime Systems: Does the Increasing Use of Naval Weapon Systems Present a Challenge for IHL?Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 119-126.
Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Military Informatics (OpenPhD ) : Lethal Autonomy of Weapons is Designed and/or Recessive.Nyagudi Nyagudi Musandu - 2016-12-09 - Dissertation, OpenPhD (#Openphd) E.G. Wikiversity Https://En.Wikiversity.Org/Wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy , Etc.
Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems and Responsibility Gaps.Anne Gerdes - 2018 - Philosophy Study 8 (5).
Predators or Ploughshares? Arms Control of Robotic Weapons.Robert Sparrow - 2009 - IEEE Technology and Society 28 (1):25-29.
Twenty Seconds to Comply: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Recognition of Surrender.Robert Sparrow - 2015 - International Law Studies 91:699-728.
Meaningful Human Control Over Automated Driving Systems.D. D. Heikoop, M. P. Hagenzieker, G. Mecacci, F. Santoni De Sio, S. C. Calvert & B. van Arem - unknown
Meaningful Human Control – and the Politics of International Law.Thilo Marauhn - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 207-218.
Theoretical Foundations for the Responsibility of Autonomous Agents.Jaap Hage - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):255-271.
What Is the Model of Trust for Multi-agent Systems? Whether or Not E-Trust Applies to Autonomous Agents.Massimo Durante - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):347-366.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-02
Total views
27 ( #423,198 of 2,506,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #73,892 of 2,506,536 )
2020-08-02
Total views
27 ( #423,198 of 2,506,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #73,892 of 2,506,536 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads