Corridors of cosmology

Breakthrough - A Journal on Science and Society 14 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The course of events that led to the conflict between the two main theories of cosmology in yesteryears, namely, the big bang theory and the steady state theory are recounted. The philosophical positions held by the leading scientists in these events are described. The present status of this debate and the critical role played by the Indian cosmologist J.V. Narlikar in the development of modern cosmology are high-lighted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of H Kragh (1996) Cosmology and Controversy. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):387-9.
Philosophical Contexts of the Steady-State Universe.Helge Kragh - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):129-145.
Uniformitarianism in cosmology: Background and philosophical implications of the steady-state theory.Yuri Balashov - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (6):933-958.
Theism, atheism, and big bang cosmology.William Lane Craig & Quentin Smith - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Quentin Smith.
Should We Believe in the Big Bang?: A Critique of the Integrity of Modern Cosmology.Graeme Rhook & Mark Zangari - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:228 - 237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
2 (#1,817,116)

6 months
2 (#1,258,417)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references