Jules Lequyer and the Openness of God

Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):212-235 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Until recently the most prominent defender of the openness of God was Charles Hartshorne. Evangelical thinkers are now defending similar ideas while being careful to distance themselves from the less orthodox dimensions of process theology. An overlooked figure in the debate is Jules Lequyer. Although process thinkers have praised Lequyer as anticipating their views, he may be closer in spirit to the evangelicals because of the foundational nature of his Catholicism. Lequyer’s passionate defense of freedom conceived as a creative act as well as the theological implications he drew from this are examined for their relevance to the present discussion of the openness of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
54 (#287,802)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Viney
Pittsburg State University

Citations of this work

The American Reception of Jules Lequyer: From James to Hartshorne.Donald Wayne Viney - 2015 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 36 (3):260-277.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fate and Logic: Cahn on Hartshorne Revisited.George W. Shields - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):369-378.
Does Omniscience Imply Foreknowledge?Donald Wayne Viney - 1989 - Process Studies 18 (1):30-37.

Add more references