2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora

Rivista di Estetica 49:99-113 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carnap (1932) famously attacked Heidegger for having constructed an insane metaphysics based on a misconception of both the logical form and the semantics of ordinary language. In what follows, it will be argued that, once one appropriately reads Heidegger’s famous dictum “the nothing nothings” in a Russellian fashion, there is nothing either logically or semantically wrong with it. The real controversy as to how that sentence has to be evaluated – not as to its meaning but as to its truth – lies at the metaphysico-ontological level.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger's Logico-Semantic Strikeback.Alberto Voltolini - 2015 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 22:19-38.
Il nulla nulleggia ancora.Giuliano Torrengo - 2012 - Rivista di Estetica 49.
Does the Nothing Noth?Michael Inwood - 1999 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 44:271-290.
Davidson's Semantics and Computational Understanding of Language.Damjan Bojadžiev - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):133-139.
Davidson's Semantics and Computational Understanding of Language.Damjan Bojadžiev - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):133-139.
Davidson on Convention.Dunja Jutronić-Tihomirović - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):121-132.
Davidson on Convention.Dunja Jutronić-Tihomirović - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):121-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
10 (#1,204,152)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alberto Voltolini
University of Turin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references