Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?

Law and Philosophy 21 (2):137-164 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contested commodities.L. Radzik & D. Schmidtz - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (6):603-616.
Practices and the rule of recognition.Sean Coyle - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (4):417-452.
The concept of fetal rights.Carl Wellman - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (1):65-93.
Introduction.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (6):649-653.
Introduction.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (2):115-120.
Introduction.Colin M. Macleod - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (2):117-119.
An attitudinal theory of excuse.Peter Westen - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):289-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
49 (#334,241)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Essential Contestability and Evaluation.Pekka Väyrynen - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):471-488.
The Rule of Law and Equality.Paul Gowder - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (5):565-618.
Traditions and True Successors.David-Hillel Ruben - 2013 - Social Epistemology 27 (1):32 - 46.
The Political Literacy of Experts.Andreas Eriksen - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (1):82-97.
Law is not (best considered) an essentially contested concept.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references