Learning to recognise objects

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1):22-31 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evidence from neurophysiological and psychological studies is coming together to shed light on how we represent and recognize objects. This review describes evidence supporting two major hypotheses: the first is that objects are represented in a mosaic-like form in which objects are encoded by combinations of complex, reusable features, rather than two-dimensional templates, or three-dimensional models. The second hypothesis is that transform-invariant representations of objects are learnt through experience, and that this learning is affected by the temporal sequence in which different views of the objects are seen, as well as by their physical appearance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objects for multisensory perception.Casey O’Callaghan - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1269-1289.
REVIEWS-Learning to recognize objects.Guy Wallis & Heinrich Bulthoff - 1999 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1).
Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world.Roger N. Shepard - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):581-601.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-04

Downloads
79 (#216,511)

6 months
9 (#355,374)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?