Painting and Reality

Review of Metaphysics 12 (3):475 - 480 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This question does not mean: what has a philosopher to learn from paintings? Rather it is: what metaphysical implications can be derived from the consideration of the art of painting? Since, however, this consideration is not a contemplation but a theorizing, we must understand Gilson's question to be: what metaphysical implications can be suggested by a theory about the creative activity of painters and about the kind of entity a painting is?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Painting and Reality.Etienne Gilson - 1957 - [New York] : Pantheon Books.
Painting and Reality.Ronald W. Hepburn - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (38):90.
Painting and Reality. [REVIEW]John A. Oesterle - 1959 - New Scholasticism 33 (2):263-266.
Painting and Reality. [REVIEW]Leonard A. Waters - 1959 - Modern Schoolman 36 (2):117-120.
Painting and Reality. [REVIEW]Leonard A. Waters - 1959 - Modern Schoolman 36 (2):117-120.
Painting and Reality. [REVIEW]F. D. J. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):144-144.
Painting and Reality.Stephen C. Pepper - 1957 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 17 (2):259-260.
Painting and reality. [REVIEW]Etienne Gilson - 1957 - Sapientia 15 (56):150.
Weiss and the Problem of Togetherness.George Schrader - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):227 - 243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
20 (#792,731)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references