Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (4):411-452 (2013)

This article attempts to assess Mario Bunge’s important but widely neglected criticisms of dialectics. It begins by providing a contextualized interpretation of Friedrich Engels’s metaphysics of the dialectics of nature before embarking on a detailed discussion of Leon Trotsky’s and contemporary “dialectical” scientists’ views on materialist dialectics. It argues that while some of Bunge’s criticisms are eminently sensible, the principles underlying the works of dialectical scientists are compatible with Bunge’s emergentist and systemic approach and can shed light on such issues as the levels of organization, the diachronic and synchronic aspects of emergence, and the individualism-holism-systemism trilemma. This article also submits that dialectics is best interpreted as a guideline for a philosophy of change instead of a magical wand that liberates the investigator from study of facts. Understood as something that serves heuristic purposes, dialectics can be sensibly utilized by scientists to shore up or refine their methodological principles and thereby to facilitate empirical research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393112441974
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 130 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Engels’s Emergentist Dialectics.Kaan Kangal - 2020 - Monthly Review 6 (72):18-27.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Systemic Planning: Dealing with Complexity by a Wider Approach to Planning.Steen Leleur - 2007 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 9 (1-2):2-10.
Thermodynamic-Like Approach to Complexity of the Financial Market (in the Light of the Present Financial Crises).A. Khrennikov - 2010 - In Marisa Faggini, Concetto Paolo Vinci, Antonio Abatemarco, Rossella Aiello, F. T. Arecchi, Lucio Biggiero, Giovanna Bimonte, Sergio Bruno, Carl Chiarella, Maria Pia Di Gregorio, Giacomo Di Tollo, Simone Giansante, Jaime Gil Aluja, A. I͡U Khrennikov, Marianna Lyra, Riccardo Meucci, Guglielmo Monaco, Giancarlo Nota, Serena Sordi, Pietro Terna, Kumaraswamy Velupillai & Alessandro Vercelli (eds.), Decision Theory and Choices: A Complexity Approach. Springer Verlag Italia. pp. 183--203.
Komplexität und Realismus.Fausto Fraisopi - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy:265-279.
Complexity and Scientific Modelling.Bruce Edmonds - 2000 - Foundations of Science 5 (3):379-390.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #391,888 of 2,498,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #210,759 of 2,498,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes