Educational Theory 64 (3):227-244 (2014)

A controversy rages over the question of how should controversial topics be taught. Recent work has advanced the “epistemic criterion” as the resolution to this controversy. According to the epistemic criterion, a matter should be taught as controversial when contrary views can be entertained on the matter without the views being contrary to reason. When an issue is noncontroversial, according to the epistemic criterion, the correct position can be taught “directively,” with the teacher endorsing that position. When there is a legitimate controversy, the view should be taught “nondirectively,” with the teacher remaining neutral. In response, Bryan Warnick and Spencer Smith argue that the proponents of the epistemic criterion fail to recognize the multidimensional nature of what it means to learn to be rational. Recognizing this complexity undermines the link between the epistemic status of the controversy and directiveness of one's teaching, suggesting more flexibility in how teachers approach controversial issues. It also implies the need for a new category of teaching, which Warnick and Smith call “soft-directive” teaching
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/edth.12059
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,568
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Teaching Controversial Issues: A Pragmatic View of the Criterion Debate.Emil Sætra - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 53 (2):323-339.
Assessment, Truth and Religious Studies.John Tillson - 2019 - Studies in Philosophy and Education (2):195-210.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Receiving the Gift of Teaching: From 'Learning From' to 'Being Taught By'.Gert Biesta - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (5):449-461.
Fallibilism and the Flexibility of Epistemic Modals.Charity Anderson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):597-606.
Ethics Without Controversy?Heidi Giebel - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (4):363-374.
Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-Classical Ion Debate.William Goodwin - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):787-816.
Towards a Theory of Propositional Curriculum Content.John Tillson - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (1):137-148.
Philosophy for Children and Other People.William J. Rapaport - 1987 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy (Summer):19-22.
Representing the Object of Controversy: The Case of the Molecular Clock.Michael R. Dietrich - 2007 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (2):161 - 176.
Medical Fact and Ulcer Disease: A Study in Scientific Controversy Resolution.Mark Cherry - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):249 - 273.
Epistemic Levels and the Problem of the Criterion.Andrew D. Cling - 1997 - Philosophical Studies 88 (2):109-140.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #929,530 of 2,385,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,301 of 2,385,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes