Notes on Cicero, Ad Atticum 1 and 2

Classical Quarterly 12 (02):252- (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since is a good Greek word, most scholars have assumed that it must be retained, and that the corruption is confined to the unintelligible letters which precede it. Constans deleted these letters as the remnant of a gloss, Sternkopf emended them to velut; neither solution is satisfactory, since by itself, without an indication of the recipient, is hardly intelligible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notes on Cicero, Ad Atticum 1 and 2.W. S. Watt - 1962 - Classical Quarterly 12 (3-4):252-262.
Notes on Cicero, Ad Atticum 1 and 2.W. S. Watt - 1918 - Classical Quarterly 12 (2):252-262.
Note on Cicero Ad Atticum 2. 12.Clement L. Smith - 1907 - Classical Quarterly 1 (4):273-274.
Note on Cicero Ad Atticum 2. 12.Clement L. Smith - 1907 - Classical Quarterly 1 (04):273-.
Cicero, Ad Atticum xiv. 5. 1.P. A. Brunt - 1961 - The Classical Review 11 (03):199-200.
Note on Cicero ad Atticum, v. 19. 2.L. C. Purser - 1897 - The Classical Review 11 (06):305-.
Note on Cicero ad Atticum, v. 19. 2.L. C. Purser - 1897 - The Classical Review 11 (6):305-305.
On the Date of Ad Atticum 2. 24.Lily Ross Taylor - 1954 - Classical Quarterly 4 (3-4):181-.
Cicero: Ad Atticum 2. 24.P. A. Brunt - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):62-.
On the Date of Ad Atticum 2. 24.Lily Ross Taylor - 1954 - Classical Quarterly 4 (3-4):181-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
20 (#761,609)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references