The States' Role in National Health Reform

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):690-692 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Debates over health care reform often focus on the appropriate role for the government in health care. Much less attention is paid to defining the respective roles of the states and the federal government. Yet, in the American political system, the basic issue of federalism has profound implications.The question for the nation is which aspects of health policy should reflect national, uniform standards, and which should vary according to local conditions, values, and preferences. Economic mobility and the desire for efficiency militate for national uniformity and federal standards. By contrast, state policies can be more closely tailored to local economic conditions and can reflect local values regarding matters such as the appropriate role of government.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The States' Role in National Health Reform.Alan R. Weil & James R. Tallon - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):690-692.
Federal Indian Law as a Structural Determinant of Health.Aila Hoss - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S4):34-42.
The Role of ERISA Preemption in Health Reform: Opportunities and Limits.Peter D. Jacobson - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (s2):86-100.
Medical insurance payments and patients involved in research.Angela R. Holder - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (1-2):19-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
7 (#1,412,480)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references