Abstract
I am primarily concerned here with C. I. Lewis's suggestion in a letter to me that some admitted defects in his ethical views might be removed by appealing to Peirce's views on the summum bonum, which Peirce identified as the evolutionary process whereby the universe becomes more and more orderly. Since Lewis held in his published writings that what is morally obligatory can never be determined by empirical facts alone, I argue that since the alleged growing orderliness of the universe must be established empirically, Lewis cannot analyze an obligatory action as one that contributes to that process without abandoning his view that obligatoriness cannot be established empirically. I also argue that if Lewis were to abandon his opposition to a naturalistic theory of obligation, appealing to Peirce's summum bonum would not help Lewis out of what he called his predicament in ethics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2653568
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peirce’s Summum Bonum and the Ethical Views of C. I. Lewis and John Dewey.Morton White - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1029-1037.
Peirce’s Summum Bonum and the Ethical Views of C. I. Lewis and John Dewey.Morton White - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1029-1037.
The 'Summum Bonum' in the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce.David Elmer Pfeifer - 1971 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Peirce's Esthetics: A Taste for Signs in Art.Martin Lefebvre - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):318-344.
Peirce's Esthetics: A Taste for Signs in Art.Martin Lefebvre - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):319-344.
Peirce's Pragmatic Theology and Stoic Religious Ethics1.John R. Shook - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):344-363.
Peirce and C. I. Lewis on Quale.Joanna Szelegieniec & Szymon Nowak - 2014 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):43-62.
O Bonum e o Summum Bonum no Pensamento de Tomás de Aquino.Fritz-Joachim von Rintelen - 1977 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 33 (2/3):182 - 195.
" Bonum" e" summum Bonum" nell¿ Etica di Spinoza.Franco Biasutti - 1994 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 23 (1):3-16.
How to Be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism.John Greco - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-19

Total views
12 ( #728,684 of 2,348,302 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,851 of 2,348,302 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes