Is There a Moral Reason To Limit Family Size?

Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 29 (3/4):26-31 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although we have an important obligation to protect the environment, people are not morally required to choose to have smaller families for environmental reasons.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is There a Moral Obligation to Limit Family Size?Scott Wisor - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 29 (3/4):26-31.
Regional variations in family size in the Republic of Ireland.John Coward - 1980 - Journal of Biosocial Science 12 (1):1-14.
The Moral Obligation of Corporations to Protect the Natural Environment.Napoleon M. Mabaquiao - 2017 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 18 (1):28-42.
Family Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges.Carolyn McLeod & Francoise Baylis (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reasons for Having Children: Ends, Means and 'Family Values'.Susanne Gibson - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (3):231-240.
On the Idea of Degrees of Moral Status.Dick Timmer - forthcoming - Journal of Value Inquiry:1-19.
Engelhardt on the Family.Hon-Lam Li - 2013 - International Journal of Chinese and Comparative Philosophy of Medicine (153-160).
Environmental ethics and size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-23

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references