Contemporary Political Theory 2 (2):187-208 (2003)

Abstract
In this paper I explore some connections between two anti-essentialist approaches to democratic theory — Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's hegemonic approach and Slavoj Zizek's psychoanalytic approach. I argue that a central virtue of Laclau and Mouffe's hegemonic approach to democracy is that it clearly emphasizes the ethos of democracy, not simply the institutions of democracy. This shift transforms democracy, now conceived as radical democratic ethos, into a site of further research about how to make our understanding of its conditions more theoretically nuanced. In the main bulk of the paper, I explore how Slavoj Zizek's notion of an authentic political act seeks to develop this understanding
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300064
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rethinking Radical Democracy.Paulina Tambakaki - 2019 - Contemporary Political Theory 18 (4):498-518.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-23

Total views
14 ( #657,700 of 2,349,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes