- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The incommensurability thesis
Philosophical Studies 25 (4):299 - 301 (1974)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Demise of the Incommensurability Thesis.Howard Sankey - 2018 - In Moti Mizrahi (ed.), The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? London: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 75-91.
Three Kinds of Incommensurability Thesis.Lance Simmons - 1994 - American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (2):119 - 131.
Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis: What’s the Argument?Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (4):361-378.
Thomas Kuhn’s Incommensurability: Thesis and Argument.JoonHo Park - 2015 - 동서철학연구(Dong Seo Cheol Hak Yeon Gu; Studies in Philosophy East-West) 78:495-520.
Berkeley's Idealism-Internal Realism and Incommensurability-Thesis.Taritmoy Ghosh - 1998 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 25 (2):241-252.
Book review of Howard Sankey The Incommensurability Thesis. [REVIEW]Dudley Shapere - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):139-141.
Scientific realism and the semantic incommensurability thesis.Howard Sankey - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):196-202.
Semantic Externalism: A Way of Refuting the Incommensurability Thesis.Hashem Morvarid - 2009 - پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین 1 (7):91-106.
The Evolving Notion and Role of Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis.James A. Marcum - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
50 (#309,648)
6 months
13 (#277,486)
2009-01-28
Downloads
50 (#309,648)
6 months
13 (#277,486)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On the historical origins of the contemporary notion of incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend's assault on conceptual conservatism.Eric Oberheim - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36 (2):363-90.
On the historical origins of the contemporary notion of incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s assault on conceptual conservativism.Eric Oberheim - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (2):363-390.
The intelligibility objection against underdetermination.Rogério Passos Severo - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):121-146.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1969 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69 (1):149 - 186.
Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic.Imre Lakatos - 1968 - In The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam,: North Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 315--417.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo